<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>PAMAS</provider_name><provider_url>https://blog.pamas.de/en/</provider_url><author_name>Anja Mertens</author_name><author_url>https://blog.pamas.de/en/author/anja-mertens/</author_url><title>Laser-optical particle counting compared to pore blockage technique - PAMAS</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="MyzAV65ziH"&gt;&lt;a href="https://blog.pamas.de/en/laseroptische-partikelzahlung-vs-siebverblockung/"&gt;Laser-optical particle counting compared to pore blockage technique&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://blog.pamas.de/en/laseroptische-partikelzahlung-vs-siebverblockung/embed/#?secret=MyzAV65ziH" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Laser-optical particle counting compared to pore blockage technique&#x201D; &#x2014; PAMAS" data-secret="MyzAV65ziH" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://blog.pamas.de/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://blog.pamas.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Labor.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1280</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>854</thumbnail_height><description>Fluid contamination can be measured by various different analysing methods. In this blog post, we compare the laser optical method of light extinction against pore blockage. How does the Light Extinction method work? The illumination source is a laser diode. The laser light beam is collimated by a lens array and formed to a straight [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
